Log-based water saturation equations, such as those of Archie (1942) and Simandoux (1963), are used to calculate the water saturation at a particular depth and for a particular formation. However, it is the saturation height function that allows us to calculate fluid saturations at any given point in a reservoir. Over the years many different methods for calculating a saturation height function have been developed.
What effect does choosing one method over another have? What are the differences between methodologies and are they important? And ultimately, is it possible to choose a 'correct' or 'right' method?
In this whitepaper, three industry standard methods have been used to construct saturation height functions from the same dataset from Browse Basin, NW Australia. Comparing these results, we shall highlight and describe the differences between the methods and why these differences are important. Finally, we shall also discuss the effect that each method has on calculated water saturation and ultimately how saturation height functions can affect the calculated hydrocarbon volume.

SHF-Whitepaper-Figure

The information on this form will allow us (the PDS Group) respond to your request.
Every now and then, we (the PDS Group) would like to send you information about our products and services that are relevant to you. Submitting your details on this form tells us that you are OK with this and that you agree with our Terms of UsePrivacy and Cookie policies. You can of course opt-out of these communications at any time. Our Information Security Policy contains more information about how we use and protect your data.



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.